‘Punk’ing North Korea: LFM Reviews LA Film Fest’s The Red Chapel

[Editor’s Note: LFM will be covering a series of provocative films debuting this week and next at The Los Angeles Film Festival.]

By Joe Bendel. What a disclaimer.  Danish director Mads Brügger explains all the footage the audience is about to watch had been thoroughly vetted by North Korean state censors.  Yet his suspicion that the post-modern irony he would unleash on the world’s most isolated country would be lost on the Communist authorities proved largely correct.  The gutsiest act of cinematic provocation perhaps ever, Mads Brügger’s The Red Chapel (trailer below) is a genuine highlight of this year’s Los Angeles Film Festival.

Ostensively, Brügger came to North Korea with two Danish Korean comedians, Simon Jul Jørgensen and Jacob Nossell, to stage a good will show.  However, his real intent was to expose the unrelentingly oppressive nature of the DPRK system.  Though submission to state censorship was a given right from the start, Brügger thought he had an ace in the hole: Nossell.

A self-described “spastic” (Nossell’s words, not mine), the subversive director knew Nossell would make the North Koreans uneasy, since those born with disabilities simply do not survive in their socialist paradise.  Brügger also hoped Nossell would be able to speak freely on film, because none of the censors would understand his “spastic Danish” (Brügger’s words, not mine).

Mads Brügger and Jacob Nossell 'punk' their North Korean minders.

As soon as the Danes arrived in the North, their minder, Mrs. Pak, fastened herself to them like glue.  Her response to Nossell was particularly bizarre, almost smothering him with attention.  However, even Mrs. Pak could not fake an enthusiastic response to the program the comedians had prepared.  Featuring skits in drag and an unclassifiable rendition of Oasis’s “Wonderwall,” it was not just bad, it was awe-inspiringly awful.  It is hard to say which is funnier, their variety show on crack, or the stone-face reactions of their hosts.  However, seeing the propaganda potential of the show, the North Korean authorities set about adapting it to their ideological purposes, making it “more Korean.”  So much for cultural exchange.

While Chapel is at times a riotous exercise in comedic performance art, the overall film is as serious as a heart attack.  The pathological nature of DPRK society weighed particularly heavily on Nossell, causing frequent rifts between him and the director.  It all comes to a head when Nossell very publicly refuses to participate in one of the regime’s big, scary anti-American mass demonstrations.  It is a scene fraught with its own irony, as Brügger – the rebellious gadfly – tries to cajole his countrymen into professing support for what he calls the regime’s “mother lie,” the Communist myth that American aggression precipitated the Korean War.

Though he makes a noble effort, Brügger fails to capture the smoking gun scene that would utterly lay bare the nature of North Korean tyranny. Of course, he was doomed from the start, because the Communists set all the rules and could change them at their convenience.  Still, there are plenty of telling moments (particularly the climactic demonstration), as well as some outrageous humor.

Chapel has been compared to The Yes Men, but that does not do Brügger justice.  Unlike the play-it-safe leftist pranksters, Brügger was punking a target that exercises absolute, unchecked power – on its own turf.  Based on the DPRK’s apoplectic response to the film, it is doubtful Brügger will ever return to make a sequel.  He probably will not miss the place.  Beyond surreal, Chapel simply has to be seen to be believed.  Enthusiastically recommended, it screens Saturday (6/19) and Thursday (6/24) during the 2010 LAFF.

Posted on June 17th, 2010 at 10:31am.

DVD Mini-Review: The Book of Eli

Denzel Washington in "The Book of Eli."

By Jason Apuzzo. The pitch: Samurai-style warrior Denzel Washington wanders the post-apocalyptic wasteland carrying the last Bible on Earth. His mission, given to him in a vision, is to carry the Bible west to where a last remnant of civilized humanity can preserve it for generations to come.  Standing in his way is Gary Oldman – the corrupt, tinpot dictator of a Wild West-style town who wants to use Denzel’s Bible for his own nefarious ends.  And caught in the middle, fetchingly, is young prostitute Mila Kunis, who must choose between leaving town with Denzel or remaining in the purgatorial, Dodge City hell of Gary Oldman’s harem …

What works:

• Denzel.  His star power, and the compelling mixture of ruthlessness and humanity he brings to the role, are the best things the film has going for it.  He’s very watchable, particularly in the film’s quieter moments.

• The stylized look and feel of the post-apocalyptic wasteland.  Although the wasteland in Eli isn’t the riotous spectacle that The Road Warrior‘s badlands were, it has a dark, menacing sobriety to it that works well given the film’s theme.

• The basic premise of the film is strong, and holds it together through some clunky sequences.

Denzel Washington and Mila Kunis.

What doesn’t work:

• For the umpteenth time in his career, Gary Oldman isn’t given enough to do other than sneer.  His final face-off with Denzel is anti-climactic in the extreme.

• The film can’t decide whether it’s a kick-ass action thriller, or a serious meditation on Christian faith.  As a result, it ends up being neither.

• Female lead Mila Kunis is too mousy to play sexy … yet too sexy to play mousy.  As a result, she ends up being neither.

The Book of Eli – which is newly out this week on DVD, Blu-Ray and Amazon download (see the LFM Store below) – is really a Western, pure and simple.  My sense is that the film might actually have done better if it hadn’t tried to be some sort of Christian allegory, but had instead depicted Denzel transporting something more mundane across the post-apocalyptic wasteland … like  maybe Julia Child’s Joy of Cooking.  I’m only half-kidding saying that, because the problem with this film – directed by the Hughes brothers – is that it just takes itself far too seriously.  A little humor would’ve helped matters greatly, because the film’s low budget and somewhat ham-handed action sequences are actually far below what we’ve come to expect from big Hollywood action spectacles.  If you come looking for Mad Max, you’re not going to get it in this film.  At the same time, you’re not really getting The Seventh Seal, either.  What you’re getting is something that’s passably entertaining, and modestly thoughtful, but not nearly as cathartic as it could be.

On balance, though, I wish that Hollywood made a lot more pictures of this sort – because with the apocalypse seemingly getting closer by the day, I really need to know what to wear once the bombs start dropping.  And I love Denzel’s shades.

[Special note to Christian audiences of this film: it’s Rated R and is very violent.  Viewer discretion definitely advised.]

Posted on June 16th, 2010 at 11:07pm.

Hollywood Round-up, 6/16

Decades later, Steve McQueen is back in the news.

By Jason Apuzzo. • Robert Downey, Jr. and his wife have formed a production company, and their first project will be to produce Steve McQueen’s script (yes, that Steve McQueen) for Yucatan, the Mexico-motorcycle heist film McQueen wanted to do long ago. Steve’s son Chad will be exec. producing. Although I’m not a huge fan of Downey’s, this is a genuinely great idea and somewhere up above The King of Cool is smiling in his Mustang.

A 3D IMAX release of The Green Hornet is set for January 14th of next year. Troubling subtext: January is a frequent dumping ground of projects nobody has confidence in.  Will Green Hornet end up in the red?  In related news, the new version of The Thing will be coming out on April 29th of next year. This Thing is technically a prequel to John Carpenter’s remake … so does that mean it’s also a ‘reboot’?  I’m trying to get a handle on this.

A sequel to Karate Kid is already in the works. Sequel + Reboot = SeeBoot. You read it here first.

Aishwarya Rai.

• A liberal group has created an on-line petition to stop Disney from putting Sarah Palin’s new Alaska/nature show on the Learning Channel.  My advice is to flood the email box of this website with enormous, 2mb photo images of Naughty Monkey pumps.

George Clooney has been made a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. That’s not the punch-line, that’s the actual news story.  He joins Michael Douglas and Warren Beatty on the Council’s Sub-Division on Global Narcissism.

Did Al Gore have an affair with Inconvenient Truth producer Laurie David? Or is it all just an on-line hoax?  Right now Al’s regretting inventing the internet.

• Obnoxious Brit left-winger Michael Winterbottom (The Road to Guantanamo, The Killer Inside Me) is at it again. His next project will apparently be The Promised Land, about the battle between Jewish insurgents and British occupiers in the Palestine of the 1930s. Winterbottom gets the perfect Brit-leftie 2-fer here: implying moral equivalency between Jews of the 1930s and contemporary Islamic terrorists, and comparing current American occupations to failed British occupations of the pre-World War II era. Silver lining? Nobody watches Michael Winterbottom’s films.

• AND IN TODAY’S MOST IMPORTANT NEWS … the Hollywood reporter takes time out to interview the lovely Indian star and former Miss Universe Aishwarya Rai, about her new film Ravaan.

And that’s what’s happening today in the wonderful world of Hollywood …

Posted on June 16th, 2010 at 5:36pm.

What is Christopher Nolan Doing with Superman?

By Jason Apuzzo.  Speculation is currently very heated about the exact nature of the plotline to writer-director Christopher Nolan’s forthcoming film, Inception.

Why the speculation is so heated is actually something of a puzzle to me, in so far as the film’s trailer would seem to make Inception‘s storyline fairly clear: the film appears to be a kind of sci-fi, Hitchcockian thriller based on the concept of what used to be termed mind-control and/or brainwashing.

According to Warner Brothers, the film’s distributor:

“Acclaimed filmmaker Christopher Nolan directs an international cast in an original sci-fi actioner that travels around the globe and into the intimate and infinite world of dreams. Dom Cobb (Leonardo DiCaprio) is a skilled thief, the absolute best in the dangerous art of extraction, stealing valuable secrets from deep within the subconscious during the dream state, when the mind is at its most vulnerable. Cobb’s rare ability has made him a coveted player in this treacherous new world of corporate espionage, but it has also made him an international fugitive and cost him everything he has ever loved. Now Cobb is being offered a chance at redemption. One last job could give him his life back but only if he can accomplish the impossible—inception. Instead of the perfect heist, Cobb and his team of specialists have to pull off the reverse: their task is not to steal an idea but to plant one. If they succeed, it could be the perfect crime. But no amount of careful planning or expertise can prepare the team for the dangerous enemy that seems to predict their every move. An enemy that only Cobb could have seen coming. This summer, your mind is the scene of the crime.”

Personally Nolan’s much-hyped film is of little interest to me, due to its seemingly derivative quality; the film appears to be a kind of pastiche of familiar elements from The Matrix, Memento, The Thirteenth Floor, Dark City and myriad other recent films that have plumbed the theme of mind control.  Inception already appears to lack the punchy, campy vitality of the original Matrix; nor does Nolan appear to have developed a sense of humor – we’re apparently still going to be waiting for that in one of his films.  [And I’ve been waiting for it ever since his Following, from 1998.]  But Nolan certainly made Warner Brothers enough money from The Dark Knight that he’s earned the right to do what he wants to do with Inception – it’s his film.

Your mind is the scene of the crime: from Christopher Nolan’s “Inception.”

Superman is a somewhat different matter.  As has been widely reported, Nolan has been given by Warner Brothers what amounts to supervisory control over the forthcoming ‘reboot’ of the Superman franchise.  He’s been given this control due to the wild financial success of The Dark Knight. But Superman is an altogether different kind of ‘property.’  The Superman character is an important figure of American iconography – a product, actually, of America’s epochal battle against fascism in World War II.  Going ‘edgy’ or ‘dark’ with the Superman character – which is ostensibly why Nolan was brought in – is therefore quite a tricky matter.

Miles Millar’s comic series Superman: Red Son (an image of which is seen at the top of this post) – the much-discussed series in which Superman is re-envisioned as a Soviet superhero of the working people – offers a vivid example of how even something as seemingly stable as the Superman image can be tampered with in drastic ways.  With the full-throated support of the fanboy community, Millar was pitching Superman movies as recently as two years ago, although in fairness I don’t believe the Red Son plotline was part of his pitch.  The point is, though, that Bryan Singer’s Superman Returns actually went so far as to drop the ‘American way’ from the famous Superman ‘credo’ of standing for “Truth, Justice and the American Way.”  So does anyone really trust these people to retain the essence of the Superman character as a patriotic icon?

There are already rumors about what the next Superman film might be like from the plot standpoint.  The rumors don’t really tell us much – or at least, they don’t tell us the really important things to know.  But I’m long-past trusting the studios to handle this material anymore.  And now Christopher Nolan – the guy making the brainwashing film, who brought a sinister allure to the Batman series – is entrusted with Superman.  And I’m actually a little concerned about it.

For now Nolan has been keeping his cards close to the vest about his plans for Superman.  I understand the showmanship aspect of keeping things secret, but at this point I’d actually like to know a little more about where he intends to take the Superman franchise.  Hopefully during the rollout of Inception we’ll hear a lot more from him about this.

Posted on June 16th, 2010 at 12:57am.

Hollywood Round-up, 6/15

A return to the world of Tolkein for Peter Jackson?

By Jason Apuzzo.Pressure is mounting on Peter Jackson to direct The Hobbit, which he’s already co-written. Jackson is now facing the same question faced by George Lucas long, long ago: when do you let a franchise take over your career?  Answer: when the franchise makes north of $1 billion.

Sam Raimi will apparently be directing Disney’s 3D Wizard of Oz prequel, Oz: The Great And Powerful. Rumors flying that Robert Downey, Jr. may star. If Raimi does this properly, the box office on this will make Alice in Wonderland look like Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore.

Ridley Scott currently preparing 1, maybe 2 Alien prequels. First prequel will focus on mysterious ‘space jockey’ alien from original film.  Hints also dropped that prequel may be in 3D.  Short of a Blade Runner follow-up, this is about the only thing Sir Ridley could do to get me to watch his films again.  He’s got a lot to answer for after Kingdom of Heaven and Robin Hood … not to mention Matchstick Men.

Can Katherine play a likeable character?

Star Kristen Stewart eager to tackle new 2-part Twilight: Breaking Dawn. No wonder!  It’s currently Hollywood’s only major franchise based around a woman.

• The trailer for Sofia Coppola’s new film Somewhere is out and it looks good.  Note how much Sofia communicates without resorting to dialogue.  Looking forward to this.

In the wake of the Killers debacle, pundits are asking whether Katherine Heigl is actually capable of playing a likeable character. That problem hasn’t hurt Woody Allen for over 20 years.

Click here to watch Kevin Costner describe his oil/water separator on ABC’s Good Morning America. This snappy little device is easily the best thing to come out of Waterworld, aside from Dennis Hopper’s eyepatch.

Click here to see the trailer for Centurion, the new ultra-violent movie about ancient Roman warriors in Great Britain. Nice to see a flick that takes the pro-Roman side, for once.  Could do without the excess gore, though.  [Didn’t they have predator drones back then?]

The Feds have OK’d speculating in box office futures, and this is extremely bad news for Knight and Day.

The Real White House Gate Crashers are about to crash Bravo’s new Real Housewives of D.C. series. Did anyone not see this coming?

With states getting fussier about their images, it’s getting harder for filmmakers to receive tax credits, which is why more filmmakers should shoot in Mexico – since the Mexican government doesn’t seem to care about its image at all.

• AND IN TODAY’S MOST IMPORTANT NEWS … Megan Fox talks about two of her rumored projects: Fathom and Red Sonja. In Fathom she would be playing a “young woman named Aspen who learns she is a member of a race of aquatic humanoids who possess the ability to control water.”  Someone on Bobby Jindal’s staff needs to call this chick fast.

And that’s what’s happening today in the wonderful world of Hollywood …

Posted on June 15th, 2010 at 2:57pm.

New Atlas Shrugged Film Hits Turbulence

Could Jolie have been the star?

By Jason Apuzzo. Yesterday we posted on the new Atlas Shrugged adaptation that just went into production this past weekend.  Word comes now today from Deadline Hollywood that the film’s original director and co-producer, Stephen Polk, is threatening to sue over being dumped from the project two weeks before its start.

What’s more, Polk opens up to Deadline about the fact that the film has gone into production with such an apparently low budget, and without major stars headlining it.  Polk seems to believe that the trigger was pulled on the project too soon, with major talent (Angelina Jolie and Charlize Theron, for example, had been mentioned as possible Dagney Taggarts) potentially available to come on board.

Only time will tell how much of this is true.  One important point: according to the initial Variety article about all this, producer John Aglialoro was going to lose the feature rights if the project wasn’t in production by this past weekend.  I don’t know how this squares with Polk’s version of events.  People spend entire lifetimes in Hollywood waiting for major talent to come aboard their projects.  Would Jolie of Theron ever really have signed on to this?  Maybe.  But the question becomes: how long is a producer with rights-issues likely to wait?

In any case, none of this looks good.  It’s obviously bad to kick-off a production with a lawsuit, and this one has the potential to be devastating given the already limited resources of the production.  Needless to say, having the original director now bad-mouthing the project isn’t helping either.

My instincts tell me that given the way this Atlas Shrugged project was structured – as a 4-part film series – there was no way a major A-list actress like Jolie or Theron was going to commit to it without: 1) guaranteed studio distribution; 2) a gigantic paycheck.  That’s the reality of the situation, so it’s possible that Mr. Polk is being a little unrealistic here.

Either way, we’re still going to wish the makers of this film the best as they forge ahead under challenging circumstances.

Posted on June 15th, 2010 at 11:50am.