Putin’s New Russia: LFM Review’s LA FilmFest’s Vlast (Power)


[Editor’s Note: LFM is currently covering a series of provocative films debuting this week and next at The Los Angeles Film Festival.]

By Joe Bendel. Over 200 former employees and directors of Yukos, the Russian oil company, have been in some way persecuted by the Putin regime.  If that sounds like a coincidence, Prime Minister Putin would like to thank you for your gullibility.  Unquestionably, the biggest fish amongst his quarry was Yukos’ former CEO, the visionary Russian entrepreneur Mikhail Khodorkovsky.  At one time the sixteenth richest man in the world, Khodorkovsky now resides in a tiny prison cell.  How he got there is a chilling story of the not-so-new Russia, compellingly recounted in Cathryn Collins’ Vlast (Power), which screens during the 2010 Los Angeles Film Festival (trailer above).

Collins never confuses Khodorkovsky with a choirboy.  She makes it very clear Khodorkovsky’s early years are still shrouded in mystery and unsettling rumors.  However, she gives him credit for taking on the decrepit Yukos state enterprise at a time when the price of oil was at an all time low, eventually turning around the company – and yes, making billions in the process.

Khodorkovsky was one of the original so-called ‘oligarchs’ who largely reaped the benefits of Yeltsin’s privatization plan.  Yet he was a crony capitalist of a different color, becoming a prominent philanthropist and advocate of democracy in Russia.  He also started championing corporate transparency, only to suddenly find himself behind bars shortly thereafter.

Putin's New Russia: same as the old Russia?

First-time documentarian Collins is admirably even-handed in her profile of Khodorkovsky, never overstating her case or simply appealing to emotion.  While giving the incarcerated mogul credit for his business acumen, she is most impressed by his ability to identify and recruit smart, talented young people for his team.  Of course, the implications of his story are clear.  If a man with an estimated net worth over fifteen billion dollars is not safe in Putin’s Russia, nobody is.

Many of Vlast’s on-camera interview subjects participated at not inconsiderable risk to their well being.  In doing so, they definitely convey an unvarnished sense of life in Russia today.  Providing clear and concise historical background, Vlast provides the proper context for non-Russophiles and non-Russophobes to appreciate Khodorkovsky’s story.  Still, given the long history of Russian and Soviet anti-Semitism, the question of whether Khodorkovsky’s Jewish heritage has contributed to his persecution is strangely never really explored.

Vlast joins the growing ranks of valuable documentaries doggedly raising alarms about the lawlessness of the Putin regime.  Unfortunately, previous related films like Eric Bergkraut’s Letter to Anna and Andrei Nekrasov’s Poisoned by Polonium have largely fallen on deaf ears in the West.  Given its reasoned tone and access to Khodorkovsky’s inner circle, Vlast should impress viewers concerned about the current state of the world.  Well worth seeking out, it screens next Tuesday (6/22) and Wednesday (6/23) at the LAFF.

Posted on June 18th, 2010 at 9:47am.

24′s Joel Surnow on The Controversy over The Kennedys

"24" Producer Joel Surnow.

By Jason Apuzzo. The LA Times is featuring an interview today with Joel Surnow, creator of TV’s 24 series.  Joel kindly invited Govindini and I to the 24 set a few years back, and at the Fall 2006 Liberty Film Festival we premiered scenes from the pilot of Joel’s comedy show The Half Hour News Hour, a series that later ran on Fox News.  The jokey scenes from the pilot featuring Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter got an especially rapturous response, as I recall.

In the interview Joel discusses his forthcoming miniseries The Kennedys that will be showing on The History Channel.  That series has already been the source of some controversy, as radical left wing documentarian Robert Greenwald (Outfoxed) and his allies in the media have been trying to portray Joel’s series as a hit job against the Kennedy family.  Joel throws a bucket of cold water today on Greenwald’s paranoid speculations, reminding people that the writer of the Kennedys series, Steve Kronish, is actually a liberal Democrat.  Here’s Joel on the controversy surrounding the series:

I think part of it [the controversy] was driven by the fact that it’s going to debut around the 50th anniversary of Kennedy’s inauguration. For those looking to sustain the Camelot image, they’re worried. But they don’t need to be.

In the interview Joel also talks about setting up his own production entity for the series, and the overall benefits of working independently.  We want to wish Joel the best for The Kennedys.  Joel’s been responsible for a lot of great TV projects before, whether on 24 on Le Femme Nikita – and we’re sure this one will be colorful, as well.  One thing is for certain: whatever one thinks of the Kennedy family, they were an important part of American history in the 20th century – and they’ve certainly never been dull …

Posted on June 17th, 2010 at 12:57pm.

‘Punk’ing North Korea: LFM Reviews LA Film Fest’s The Red Chapel

[Editor’s Note: LFM will be covering a series of provocative films debuting this week and next at The Los Angeles Film Festival.]

By Joe Bendel. What a disclaimer.  Danish director Mads Brügger explains all the footage the audience is about to watch had been thoroughly vetted by North Korean state censors.  Yet his suspicion that the post-modern irony he would unleash on the world’s most isolated country would be lost on the Communist authorities proved largely correct.  The gutsiest act of cinematic provocation perhaps ever, Mads Brügger’s The Red Chapel (trailer below) is a genuine highlight of this year’s Los Angeles Film Festival.

Ostensively, Brügger came to North Korea with two Danish Korean comedians, Simon Jul Jørgensen and Jacob Nossell, to stage a good will show.  However, his real intent was to expose the unrelentingly oppressive nature of the DPRK system.  Though submission to state censorship was a given right from the start, Brügger thought he had an ace in the hole: Nossell.

A self-described “spastic” (Nossell’s words, not mine), the subversive director knew Nossell would make the North Koreans uneasy, since those born with disabilities simply do not survive in their socialist paradise.  Brügger also hoped Nossell would be able to speak freely on film, because none of the censors would understand his “spastic Danish” (Brügger’s words, not mine).

Mads Brügger and Jacob Nossell 'punk' their North Korean minders.

As soon as the Danes arrived in the North, their minder, Mrs. Pak, fastened herself to them like glue.  Her response to Nossell was particularly bizarre, almost smothering him with attention.  However, even Mrs. Pak could not fake an enthusiastic response to the program the comedians had prepared.  Featuring skits in drag and an unclassifiable rendition of Oasis’s “Wonderwall,” it was not just bad, it was awe-inspiringly awful.  It is hard to say which is funnier, their variety show on crack, or the stone-face reactions of their hosts.  However, seeing the propaganda potential of the show, the North Korean authorities set about adapting it to their ideological purposes, making it “more Korean.”  So much for cultural exchange.

While Chapel is at times a riotous exercise in comedic performance art, the overall film is as serious as a heart attack.  The pathological nature of DPRK society weighed particularly heavily on Nossell, causing frequent rifts between him and the director.  It all comes to a head when Nossell very publicly refuses to participate in one of the regime’s big, scary anti-American mass demonstrations.  It is a scene fraught with its own irony, as Brügger – the rebellious gadfly – tries to cajole his countrymen into professing support for what he calls the regime’s “mother lie,” the Communist myth that American aggression precipitated the Korean War.

Though he makes a noble effort, Brügger fails to capture the smoking gun scene that would utterly lay bare the nature of North Korean tyranny. Of course, he was doomed from the start, because the Communists set all the rules and could change them at their convenience.  Still, there are plenty of telling moments (particularly the climactic demonstration), as well as some outrageous humor.

Chapel has been compared to The Yes Men, but that does not do Brügger justice.  Unlike the play-it-safe leftist pranksters, Brügger was punking a target that exercises absolute, unchecked power – on its own turf.  Based on the DPRK’s apoplectic response to the film, it is doubtful Brügger will ever return to make a sequel.  He probably will not miss the place.  Beyond surreal, Chapel simply has to be seen to be believed.  Enthusiastically recommended, it screens Saturday (6/19) and Thursday (6/24) during the 2010 LAFF.

Posted on June 17th, 2010 at 10:31am.

DVD Mini-Review: The Book of Eli

Denzel Washington in "The Book of Eli."

By Jason Apuzzo. The pitch: Samurai-style warrior Denzel Washington wanders the post-apocalyptic wasteland carrying the last Bible on Earth. His mission, given to him in a vision, is to carry the Bible west to where a last remnant of civilized humanity can preserve it for generations to come.  Standing in his way is Gary Oldman – the corrupt, tinpot dictator of a Wild West-style town who wants to use Denzel’s Bible for his own nefarious ends.  And caught in the middle, fetchingly, is young prostitute Mila Kunis, who must choose between leaving town with Denzel or remaining in the purgatorial, Dodge City hell of Gary Oldman’s harem …

What works:

• Denzel.  His star power, and the compelling mixture of ruthlessness and humanity he brings to the role, are the best things the film has going for it.  He’s very watchable, particularly in the film’s quieter moments.

• The stylized look and feel of the post-apocalyptic wasteland.  Although the wasteland in Eli isn’t the riotous spectacle that The Road Warrior‘s badlands were, it has a dark, menacing sobriety to it that works well given the film’s theme.

• The basic premise of the film is strong, and holds it together through some clunky sequences.

Denzel Washington and Mila Kunis.

What doesn’t work:

• For the umpteenth time in his career, Gary Oldman isn’t given enough to do other than sneer.  His final face-off with Denzel is anti-climactic in the extreme.

• The film can’t decide whether it’s a kick-ass action thriller, or a serious meditation on Christian faith.  As a result, it ends up being neither.

• Female lead Mila Kunis is too mousy to play sexy … yet too sexy to play mousy.  As a result, she ends up being neither.

The Book of Eli – which is newly out this week on DVD, Blu-Ray and Amazon download (see the LFM Store below) – is really a Western, pure and simple.  My sense is that the film might actually have done better if it hadn’t tried to be some sort of Christian allegory, but had instead depicted Denzel transporting something more mundane across the post-apocalyptic wasteland … like  maybe Julia Child’s Joy of Cooking.  I’m only half-kidding saying that, because the problem with this film – directed by the Hughes brothers – is that it just takes itself far too seriously.  A little humor would’ve helped matters greatly, because the film’s low budget and somewhat ham-handed action sequences are actually far below what we’ve come to expect from big Hollywood action spectacles.  If you come looking for Mad Max, you’re not going to get it in this film.  At the same time, you’re not really getting The Seventh Seal, either.  What you’re getting is something that’s passably entertaining, and modestly thoughtful, but not nearly as cathartic as it could be.

On balance, though, I wish that Hollywood made a lot more pictures of this sort – because with the apocalypse seemingly getting closer by the day, I really need to know what to wear once the bombs start dropping.  And I love Denzel’s shades.

[Special note to Christian audiences of this film: it’s Rated R and is very violent.  Viewer discretion definitely advised.]

Posted on June 16th, 2010 at 11:07pm.

Hollywood Round-up, 6/16

Decades later, Steve McQueen is back in the news.

By Jason Apuzzo. • Robert Downey, Jr. and his wife have formed a production company, and their first project will be to produce Steve McQueen’s script (yes, that Steve McQueen) for Yucatan, the Mexico-motorcycle heist film McQueen wanted to do long ago. Steve’s son Chad will be exec. producing. Although I’m not a huge fan of Downey’s, this is a genuinely great idea and somewhere up above The King of Cool is smiling in his Mustang.

A 3D IMAX release of The Green Hornet is set for January 14th of next year. Troubling subtext: January is a frequent dumping ground of projects nobody has confidence in.  Will Green Hornet end up in the red?  In related news, the new version of The Thing will be coming out on April 29th of next year. This Thing is technically a prequel to John Carpenter’s remake … so does that mean it’s also a ‘reboot’?  I’m trying to get a handle on this.

A sequel to Karate Kid is already in the works. Sequel + Reboot = SeeBoot. You read it here first.

Aishwarya Rai.

• A liberal group has created an on-line petition to stop Disney from putting Sarah Palin’s new Alaska/nature show on the Learning Channel.  My advice is to flood the email box of this website with enormous, 2mb photo images of Naughty Monkey pumps.

George Clooney has been made a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. That’s not the punch-line, that’s the actual news story.  He joins Michael Douglas and Warren Beatty on the Council’s Sub-Division on Global Narcissism.

Did Al Gore have an affair with Inconvenient Truth producer Laurie David? Or is it all just an on-line hoax?  Right now Al’s regretting inventing the internet.

• Obnoxious Brit left-winger Michael Winterbottom (The Road to Guantanamo, The Killer Inside Me) is at it again. His next project will apparently be The Promised Land, about the battle between Jewish insurgents and British occupiers in the Palestine of the 1930s. Winterbottom gets the perfect Brit-leftie 2-fer here: implying moral equivalency between Jews of the 1930s and contemporary Islamic terrorists, and comparing current American occupations to failed British occupations of the pre-World War II era. Silver lining? Nobody watches Michael Winterbottom’s films.

• AND IN TODAY’S MOST IMPORTANT NEWS … the Hollywood reporter takes time out to interview the lovely Indian star and former Miss Universe Aishwarya Rai, about her new film Ravaan.

And that’s what’s happening today in the wonderful world of Hollywood …

Posted on June 16th, 2010 at 5:36pm.

Teacher Unions vs. Kids: The Lottery

By Joe Bendel. In New York City, parents who want their children to receive a decent education have to rely on chance.  For this sad state of affairs, they can thank the local teachers’ union, the UFT, which consistently places its own special interests above those of New York’s children at every opportunity.  Indeed, one can draw no other conclusion after screening Madeleine Sackler’s documentary The Lottery (trailer above), opening today in the city perhaps most in need of its reformist message: New York.

Eva Moskowitz was one of the few relatively moderate Democrats in the New York City Council (and my local council person).  After earning union enmity for holding hearings on the teachers’ contract, she was defeated by a vastly less talented candidate for the Manhattan Borough Presidency.  Supporting her opponent might have been the union’s biggest mistake.  After the election, she moved back up-town, where she opened the Harlem Success Academies, a series of public charter schools that dramatically out-perform the local zip-code schools.  Much to the embarrassment of the union and local administrators, over five thousand parents attended the legally mandated lottery to enroll their children in Harlem Success.  The Lottery tells their story.

There are many differences between the parents featured in Lottery.  Some are single parents, some are immigrants, and some are union members themselves.  However, they have two things in common: they all want their children to have greater opportunities in life than they did, but they do not think that is possible if their children attend their failing zip code-zoned public school.  In order for their children to be successful, they will have to be lucky in the Harlem Success lottery.

As a charter school, Harlem Success cannot choose its students.  There is no skimming cream off the top.  By law, if total demand exceeds their total registration, they must hold a lottery for all new incoming students.  Of course, that demand is enormous, overflowing the cavernous Harlem Armory Center.

None of this pleases the union, though they declined to explain why on-camera.  The only interview participant willing to shill for the UFT is former New York City Public Advocate Betsy Gotbaum, but she does not make a good spokesman for their interests.  Appropriately, we also see the “community organizers” formerly known as ACORN show up to intimidate Harlem Success parents and staff at public hearings.  (Karma seems to have caught up with them.) Continue reading Teacher Unions vs. Kids: The Lottery