Avast! LFM Mini-Review of Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides

Ian McShane as Blackbeard in "Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides."

By Jason Apuzzo. THE PITCH: With seductive mermaids, the Spanish fleet, and a cranky Geoffrey Rush standing in their way, Johnny Depp’s Captain Jack Sparrow leads saucy pirate wench Penélope Cruz and Ian McShane as Blackbeard on a quest for the mythical Fountain of Youth.

THE SKINNY: After the previous film’s reportedly $300 million budget, Disney’s formidable Pirates franchise goes on a diet – as this slightly undernourished sequel jettisons the heavy VFX sequences of the past, but makes up for them with humor and a colorful turn by Ian McShane as the legendary, real-life pirate Edward Teach/Blackbeard, along with a long-overdue love interest for Captain Jack in the form of a fiery and duplicitous Penélope Cruz.

Johnny Depp as Captain Jack Sparrow.

WHAT WORKS:

• Johnny Depp’s Jack Sparrow schtick has been refined down to a pleasant bouillabaisse of squints, smirks, pirouettes and self-effacing one-liners. It all works here again, like clockwork, and it’s the key to what makes these films tick. While most of the Pirates cast typically get lost in their costumes or heavy make-up, Depp is the only one who really seems to feel at home – always bringing a lightness of touch to the proceedings. Whatever Disney’s paying him, it’s worth it, as the franchise would be lost without his good humor.

• Even though they’re a bit too covered-up for my tastes, the film’s exciting mermaids add to the growing catalogue of vivid mythological creatures already encountered in this series.

• Typical of the Pirates series, the film’s production design is rich and sumptuous. Also helping matters out in giving the film a lavish touch is Hans Zimmer’s score, aided here by guitar flourishes from the Mexican musical pair Rodrigo y Gabriela.

• An absolutely priceless cameo from Keith Richards, who utters what’s probably the film’s most memorable line.

WHAT DOESN’T WORK:

• Geoffrey Rush is an actor I’ve never warmed to, and this film doesn’t help matters. For someone so vexatious, with a permanently constipated look on his face, he certainly gets a lot of screen time.

• In comparison to the vast VFX spectacles of the past, this new Pirates feels a little on the smallish side – and some sequences feel like filler. Also: I’m not certain that the film’s payoff at the end – at the Fountain of Youth – really packs enough of a punch, given what we’ve become accustomed to from this series.

THE BOTTOM LINE:

The Pirates franchise is a smoothly-running machine at this point, well able to withstand the loss of both Orlando Bloom and Keira Knightley; in fact, I didn’t even notice their absence from this film (something that doesn’t speak well of their abilities, incidentally). Somewhat more problematic here is the loss of budget. On Stranger Tides is a big film that certainly provides enough spectacle to get by, but things will probably need to be ramped up again later by Disney if they intend to take this franchise further.

Fortunately, however, the Pirates films are primarily about Depp’s humor – and whatever one might think of him (I still can’t say he’s a favorite of mine), Depp’s clearly found a groove in this character, as Jack Sparrow gives him a cheeky persona though which to channel his droll wit. We tend to like pirates precisely because they’re non-conformists, with bottomless appetites, and Depp mines those qualities for everything they’re worth.

Otherwise, Penélope Cruz slips comfortably into the Pirates series here as Depp’s romantic foil, a deceitful Spanish pirate lass named Angelica. And although she’s no Maureen O’Hara, I think the Latin-tempered Ms. Cruz fits this type of film better than did Keira Knightley, who was a little too porcelain-precious for my taste.

Mermaids!

Because this film is built so much around Depp, of course, On Stranger Tides isn’t going to change anyone’s mind about this series. If you already like these films, you’ll probably leave this one satisfied – if perhaps underwhelmed by the lack of spectacle. If Depp & Co. grate on you, this film won’t change your mind one bit, although On Stranger Tides‘ VFX are less intrusive than those in the last film.

One minor note: buried deep below the surface, perhaps stored inside Davy Jones’ locker, the Pirates films have always harbored a snarky attitude toward old British mainstays like the crown and the East India Trading Company. That certainly returns in this film, with a rather pitiless caricature of King George II, and it felt a little weird and incongruous after the generally pleasant proceedings of the recent royal wedding. It’s a kind of Hollywood buzzkill, just when you don’t need it.

Still, there is a real and lasting value in these films for children, or for those still capable of maintaining an innocent, child-like imagination – as the Pirates films provide a consistently creative and romantic landscape, colorful characters and creatures, and laughs that feel honest and well-earned. There is an old-fashioned sense of craft and intelligence that Disney brings to bear in these films that makes them stand out as high-quality efforts. Four films in, and with gold still pouring into Disney’s corporate coffers, the Pirates of the Caribbean series feels like it’s got very smooth sailing ahead.

Posted on May 20th, 2011 at 4:19pm.

Published by

Jason Apuzzo

Jason Apuzzo is co-Editor of Libertas Film Magazine.

11 thoughts on “Avast! LFM Mini-Review of Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides

  1. Great review, Jason.

    I’ve always liked these pictures, even though I thought the sequels were a little convoluted. Still, I always thought you got a lot of bang for your buck.

    I didn’t even know this film came out this weekend, but I think I’m in the mood for something like this.

    1. Thanks, Vince.

      This one is less convoluted in its plot. Otherwise, watch out for the mermaids …

  2. I gave up on #3 after about 45 minutes, and left it for the kids. It just went on and on and got nowhere. I don’t think I’ll bother with #4.

    1. This one’s much better than the third. I gave on the third after an hour, btw.

  3. You had me at “Penélope Cruz.”

    Ahem.

    I agree with Vince. Like far too many sequels, they’re self-indulgent, convoluted excuses for a quick paycheck, and ‘Pirates’ 2 & 3 lived down to their billing.

    The first ‘Pirates’ worked for me, because I was able to suspend my disbelief and care about the characters and be involved in their tall tale. Keira Knightley’s porcelain quality worked that one time around. Parts 2 & 3, not so much.

    Bizarre tides.

    I look forward to part 4.

    1. The main virtue of #4 is that it gets to the point much faster, and doesn’t waste time. I think these films benefit from lower budgets, because it forces them to shed the b.s.

        1. She’s pretty, but I find she’s got a lot of jaw. Watching her next to Orlando Bloom, when their faces are smudged with oil or dirt (as they usually are in these films), it’s sometimes difficult to tell who’s the male and who’s the female.

  4. I’m glad to see I’m agreeing with you this time, Jason!

    I’m still waiting for the time that a Pirate film matches the fun of the first, but this was definitely an improvement over the past two sequels. I’ve never been a huge Penelope Cruz fan, but she’s a huge step up from Knightley (and good to look at!). Casting McShane was a great idea, and I’m a sucker for gorgeous mermaids.

    Aside from that, while it was still a tad long, the plot seemed simplified compared to the convoluted nature of 2 & 3 and it definitely worked to its advantage. And I’m sorry, I know he’s kind of an idiot, but I gotta love Johnny Depp.

    1. Thanks for the kind words, there, D! Yes, we seem to agree here on all points … glad you had a good time.

Comments are closed.