Day: July 5, 2011

LFM Mini-Review: Cars 2

By David Ross. THE PITCH: Hayseed tow-truck gets mixed up in international espionage. Strange alternate universe in which cars behave like people. No explanation. Kind of creepy.

THE SKINNY: Cars 2 brings Pixar’s exuberant twenty-five-year spree to a grinding halt. Call it a mid-life crisis. The problem is not moral – the usual descent into greed, cynicism, and indifference – but conceptual. The plot is a confused and hyperactive whirlwind of genre elements and action sequences, perhaps amenable to the ADHD generation, but constantly preventing the film from taking emotional or moral root. Monsters Inc., The Incredibles, and Toy Story 3 – Pixar’s three incontestable masterpieces – are likewise action oriented, but they have a certain organic rhythm, a pattern of pause and eddy. They feel human, in short, while Cars 2 rushes in unremitting machine rhythm, much like a NASCAR race.

WHAT WORKS:

• Pixar’s technical genius has reached new and incredible heights. In the opening sequence, Finn McMissile – a 007-style Aston Martin played by Michael Caine – plunges off an oil derrick into a stormy ocean. The rolling, frothing, thoroughly natural wave dynamics are pure geek showboating. Pixar has evidently conquered all the primary technical challenges of computer animation: water, fire, wind, hair.

• Larry the Cable Guy is full of hillbilly fun as the loyal bumpkin Mater. Olivier he’s not, but then again he’s playing a buck-toothed tow-truck. Apprenticeship with the Royal Shakespeare Company not required.

WHAT DOESN’T WORK:

• In my un-American, dubiously male opinion, cars have ruined the world with their noise, pollution, and facilitation of urban-suburban sprawl. Imagine a time when it was possible to open one’s front door, pick a direction, and walk for twenty miles without fear of being flattened or suffocated in toxic fumes. In light of which, a world consisting entirely of cars – a world that is already ours in some sense – is intrinsically obnoxious and unsettling. How about a world consisting of humanoid retroviruses? Anthropomorphized Iranian centrifuges? Continue reading LFM Mini-Review: Cars 2

The Price of Liberty: LFM Reviews Ironclad

By Joe Bendel. The price of liberty has always been high, in both blood and treasure. It was true during the revolution we just celebrated on the Fourth of July and it was true during the Baron’s Revolt against King John, which led to the Magna Carta – a flawed but important document that informed our founding fathers’ conception of constitutional rights. Preferring the divine right of kings to the rights of man, John tried to reassert his absolute rule and nullify the Magna Carta, but an intrepid band of warriors will defy him, to their last breaths, in Jonathan English’s rip-roaring Ironclad (trailer here), which opens this Friday in New York.

Tired of his cruel and erratic rule, England’s barons rose up against John the First (and only), but for political reasons, they left the weakened despot on the throne after securing his signature on their revolutionary document. Unfortunately, many were lulled into a false sense of security. When John makes his play, assembling a mercenary army and securing Rome’s support, he catches most of his foes unawares. Only Rochester Castle stands between him and London. However, twenty men assembled by Baron Albany are determined to hold it at all costs, in hopes that the French will arrive to install a proper monarch.

One of those men is William Marshal, a Knight Templar recently returned from the Crusades. Like the Twelfth Century equivalent of the IDF, the Templars are well accustomed to facing numerically superior enemies. Granted twenty against one thousand is a tall order, but thanks to its construction, Rochester can be ably defended by a small force. Yes indeed, the siege is on.

Ironclad delivers plenty of old school hack-and-slash action for Game of Thrones fans jonesing for a fix. However, equally striking are its scenes of the aftermath of battle, conveying the pain and bone-weariness of the warriors. The film also presents the best depiction of medieval siege techniques yet captured on film.

While the action is thoroughly satisfying, Ironclad proves to be a film of unexpected substance. The screenplay by Jonathan English and co-writer Erick Kastel (based on a first go-round by Stephen McDool) takes notions of faith and freedom deadly seriously. Marshal explicitly states that there is nothing noble about war, ever, yet some things are still worth fighting for—in nearly those exact words. Continue reading The Price of Liberty: LFM Reviews Ironclad

LFM Review: Battlefield Heroes

By Joe Bendel. War, what is it good for? The conscripts from Baekje have absolutely no idea. They perfectly demonstrate the superiority of a volunteer army. The men (and at least one woman) of the still independent (just barely) Goguryeo Kingdom are hardly there by their own free choice, but they have a stronger motivation to fight. Yet they will still do all the dying while the glory will be reserved solely for the officers in Lee Joon-ik’s caustic farce Battlefield Heroes (trailer here), which screens during the 2011 New York Asian Film Festival.

Prepare to get muddy, bloody, and absurd. If Brecht recast Braveheart in the Seventh Century Korea, it would look a lot Battlefield. Of the Three Kingdoms of Korea, Baekje has fallen to the Chinese-aligned Silla. The Tang Dynasty has enlisted the wary Silla in its campaign against the weakened Goguryeo. However, the crafty Silla general Kim Yu-sin is only biding his time.  He might look like an addled old coot, but he’s crazy like a fox.

None of these grand macro schemes matter to “Thingy,” a dirt poor disrespected serf from former Baekje. In fact, when he accidentally defects to Goguryeo, it would only mean switching from a besieger to the besieged, were it not for Gap-sun. Meeting the ardent Goguryeo lady warrior makes quite an impression on Thingy. Needless to say, it is not mutual.

Frankly, even as a medieval keep under attack, Pyongyang was probably more livable then than now. However, Battlefield is seen as something of an allegory, with the plucky but riceless Goguryeos signifying the North, the devious Sillas serving as the South, and the Chinese Tangs functioning as stand-ins for the good old USA. Yet, as Lee must understand, North Korea is not starving because of a Southern blockade, but through the deliberate policies of its government. Not to sound churlish, but good luck making veiled political commentary in the tightly regimented DPRK. As for the imperialist Chinese, perhaps they better represent, you know, China. Continue reading LFM Review: Battlefield Heroes